What are the latest technologies being used to develop ADCs?

Targets

Most targets of ADC have unique requirements, including  homogenous expression of ADC-accessible tumor surface antigens that internalize well and trafficked to lysosomes.  Ideally the ADC targets should have minimal expression of targets in  normal tissues of critical importance.  These targets could be on tumor membranes or tumor associated cells and  in the tumor microenvironment. In the past, the target identification technologies have relied on differential expression- immunohistochemistry (IHC) based target identification.  But given the complexity, labor-intensive- time consuming aspects of  IHC analysis, there is an urgent need to employ new technologies to rapidly discover new targets for ADCs.  New technologies have included (not limited to) tumor genomics and LC-MS/MS proteomics of the membrane proteins, TCGA RNA Seq, and functional genomic mRNA profiling (FGmRNA-profiling).  Specially interesting is the  FGmRNA-profiling of tumors and normal tissues for new targets.

Bispecifics

Multi-antigen antibodies for ADCs offer unique advantage in specificity for the differential targeting of tumor antigen versus normal tissue antigens. Bispecific ADCs can not only improve TI, they offer better targeting of tumor antigens.  Medimmune’s Her2- bispecific- biparatopic ADC (MEDI-4276) allowed a better targeting of Her2- axis, including improved internalization, and lysosomal trafficking.  Due-mab antibody technology of Medimmune that utilizes mono-valent interaction with the single target (non-tumor tissues) and bivalent interaction for paired targets (tumor tissues) is uniquely positioned to  advance the bispecific ADC landscape. Additionally, there are more than 50 different formats for ADCs and many of these formats are adaptable to ADCs.  Currently a large number of bispecific ADCs using these platform are being developed.

Linkers

Stable linkers are critical for the target specific safe delivery of highly potent cytotoxic warheads to tumors.  Additionally stable linkers allow the maintenance of ADCs’ extracellular stability (systemic and normal tissue compartments) and intracellular release (e.g., tumors) in  the acid environment, the reducing environment and accessibility to deconjugation/release pathways, including lysosomal proteases.  Currently, the linkers landscape include hydrazones (acid environment based release), dual peptide (lysosomal protease (s) dependent release) , disulfide (disulfide exchange using typically glutathione) and thioether (proteolytic degradation similar to proteins).  Typically there are two types of linkers, cleavable an non-cleavable, though, most ADC construct use cleavable linkers. Acid labile hydrazone linkers take the advantage of highly acidic compartment of tumors.  Protease cleavable dipeptide linkers such as Val-Ala and Val-Cit take advantage of the unique lysosomal proteases highly dominated in many tumors while disulfide linkers take the advantage of highly abundant reducing hypoxia rich environment of some tumors.

Advertisement
ADC Bio
MabPlex
Broadpharm
Lonza
 

Non-cleavable stable linkers are designed to degrade ADCs naturally similar to all naked antibodies by the proteolytic degradation. The non-cleavable linkers require intracellular uptake and are not degraded by blood enzymes allowing very high degree of extracellular stability.  The thioether technology developed by Genentech was used in generation of non-cleavable linker for  ado-trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla; Genentech/Roche).  Although there are great stability and safety advantages for non-cleavable linkers for maintaining high systemic stability, they often modify cytotoxic warheads to largely polar entities during proteolytic degradation and reduce the bystander potency of warheads.  In some cases, polar warheads generated during proteolytic degradation of non-cleavable linkers enabled ADCs get stuck inside the cell (e,g., lysosomes) and are unable to make their site of action (e.g., DNA in nucleus).

Translational

ADCs are different from chemotherapeutic cytotoxic drugs (small molecule based cellular uptake mainly through diffusion) because they need tumor target binding and internalization for the intracellular delivery of the cytotoxic warheads. Given very limited intracellular distribution of ADCs ( typically less 1% of the injected dose) even with high target expression on tumors, it is imperative that translational approaches include  those patients whose tumors have high expression of targeted antigens, at least during the expansion stage of Phase I trials at or near the MTD dose.  If the candidate ADC shows good activity or insufficient activity in tumors with high and homogeneous expression of antigens, this may serve as a major Go or No Go decision criteria.   Given the limitations of invasive tumor biopsies,  non-invasive PET bioimaging approaches are increasingly being to identify patients who have high expression of tumor antigens.   Additionally, unique sensitivity of certain DNA repair deficient tumors to certain warheads (e.g., PBD) is being further assessed.  Translational approaches may also include defining tumor resistance pathways and the pairing of the warheads with the targets.  If a tumor has a very high expression of topoisomerase II (TOP-II) but resistance to tubulin inhibition or DNA damaging agents, it may be prudent to use TOP-II inhibitor based ADC.  Biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA, tumor derived exosomes are increasingly being used

Previous articleWhat is the clinical landscape for ADCs?
Next articleWhat does a successful ADC look like?
Rakesh Dixit, Ph.D, DABT
Rakesh Dixit, Ph.D, DABT, conducted extensive graduate and post-graduate training in Toxicology–Biochemistry with both Indian and US Institutions and is board certified in Toxicology from the American Board of Toxicology, Inc. since 1992. In December 1992, he joined the Department of Safety Assessment, Merck and Co., Inc, West Point, PA where he served in various management positions. During his about 14 years with Merck, Dixit contributed to the successful filings of many blockbuster drugs. For about a year, he was associated with Johnson and Johnson PRD, La Jolla/Alza as Senior Director of Toxicology. In Aug 2006, Dixit joined AstraZeneca Biologics (formerly MedImmune) to lead Global Biologics Safety Assessment, Experimental Pathology, and Laboratory Animal Medicine. In his current position, Dixit is responsible for providing guidance on research and development of biological products; including nonclinical toxicology/safety support for all AstraZeneca biologics products, including monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. Rakesh Dixit has published more than 60 papers in renowned international journals and has given over 100 invited lectures/presentations/workshops in national and international meetings. His areas of expertise are mainly in the area of pharmaceuticals and biologics drug development, safety assessment of small molecule drugs, biologics, vaccines and in exploring mechanisms of toxicity. He is also considered a recognized expert in safety and pharmacology biomarkers and has won many awards.